Archive for the 'prayer' Category

The meaning of ritual

I’m not big on ritual. I like the idea of ritual but my idea has always been based on the ritual meaning something. A bit vague, I realize, but …

Growing up, once a month or so we would “celebrate” the Lord’s Supper, a.k.a. take communion. We would drink our grape juice and eat our cracker niblets while sitting in our pew. (Yes, the good ol’ Protestant version of the Eucharist sans kneeling, walking, Latin, &c.) This could have been ritual — should have been a ritual what with the “do this in remembrance of me” and all — but it wasn’t because I was always stuck on the part that came before. I was stuck on the “do not partake unworthily” which, to me, meant “have no unconfessed sin in your life” so I spent the whole time sitting there confessing every sin I could think of. So, this mother (or father) of all rituals was not really a ritual; it was a time to focus on saving my ass from the unpardonable sin (I was a bit naive back then).

We always prayed before most meals but that, too, was a chore to say the “right” words and never “came from the heart.” It was just something we did that embarrassed me when we were out in public. I remember our assistant pastor would do the “long” Sunday morning prayer and mention all the prayer requests: the sick, the missionaries, &c. I would often time his prayers and always giggled to myself when he used the word “unction,” which he did quite frequently. So prayer was never a ritual for me.

Lately, I’ve tried other rituals: journaling in the morning, keeping a paper checkbook, writing my poems and blog posts on paper instead of on the computer. But none of them lasted very long. It was always “easier” to go back to the old habits.

I think my problem has been that I’ve always expected the ritual to mean something and none of these things did. They were meaningless things that I tried to do just for the sake of doing them. But, now I’m starting to think that that’s exactly what a ritual is — a meaningless thing we do just for the hell of it (more or less).

Ram Dass, in The Only Dance There Is, says the ritual, itself, is an offering. The act is an offering. It has nothing to do with my getting something out of it just like an offering is not about receiving but about giving. The ritual is something we give to God. But, he continues, once we realize that I, as the one performing the ritual, and the offering itself and the one to whom the offering is made are all part if “it all,” that it’s like

“[I am] pouring energy into energy for a matter of energy in honoring energy. So big deal, so nothing’s happened. Certainly knocks a hole in orality to start to see the universe that way. What are we doing? Nothing. How could you ever do anything, it’s all here?”

So, I think I need to rethink ritual and try a few new ones on for size — with a new attitude about them.

How about you? What rituals do you regularly do and why?

Religious tolerance the easy way

The Kansas City Star’s weekly column, Voices of Faith, for last Saturday was the question: “Do you believe in generic prayers?” The two responders were the Lama of a Tibetan Buddhist monastary and the Pastor of a Baptist church.

The crux of the Lama’s answer is:

… our prayer should have the energy of faith, compassion and love. … Nhat Hanh says … “The mere fact that we pray doesn’t lead to a result.” … Public prayers should refrain from using language specific to one faith and instead be inclusive using language that reflects our rich diversity.

The crux of the Pastor’s answer is:

If prayer is done to pacify or is generic, based on the occasions that bring together people of all backgrounds and persuasions, then it calls for sincere desire by the one who is called upon to pray out of his own conviction.

So, both are advocating the generic prayer but with the pray-er being deeply sincere in his own heart.

To me, the generic prayer doesn’t do anyone any good. Trying to use language that spans all religions — language that no one really and personally uses — results in all religions being short-changed. Language that is not faith-specific can be neither heart-felt nor said with conviction. Can you imagine David trying to write a Psalm to “the great benevolent being” or “the universal life force”? No, Christians have to call out to the God of Abraham, Issac, and Jacob. Muslims have to call out to Allah.

In this day and age of “religious tolerance” being either the work of the devil or the ultimate in PC-ness, the generic prayer is an example of the easy way out. How hard is it to be tolerant of Muslims when no one mentions Mohammed or the Allah? How hard is it to be tolerant of Buddhists when no one mentions Buddha?

True religious tolerance is being able to kneel down next to a Muslim performing salah and pray with him. True religious tolerance is relating to your God in your way while the person next to you relates to her God in her way. True religious tolerance is not homogenzing everything into a bouillabaisse of meaningless rhetoric that is pleasing to the ear but meaningless to the heart.