Recent Posts
- Individuation: Inner Work by Murray Stein
- Let’s understand Christian mythology symbolically, for once
- God and the Self in depth psychology
- Dream as psychopomp
- ken sightings unconfirmed
- Religion and Reality by Adi Da Samraj: Part II
- Religion and Reality by Adi Da Samraj: Part I
- Our Father
- Tim Freke is coming to Kansas City in May
- Farewell to the ‘misunderestimated’ president
Recent Comments
- Lynne: Re: “Adi Da uses capitalization profusely and seemly at random.” There...
- MysticSaint: hi, thanks for the quote and credit. blessings.
- Ken: Well, I thought it was funny. I was laughing out loud. I thought the contradictions were far...
- Ken: I agree that most of our knowledge is “on authority” and this is so easily...
- George Mosher: Brilliant? Really? He didn’t say anything. I mean, he’s funny and all...
- abortion adam and eve adi da aging alan watts amazon.com animal cruelty antisemitism archetypal images archetypes atheism awareness balance baptism beliefs bible bible commentary biblical interpretation black elk book burning book summary books boycott buddhism calvin and hobbes carl jung censorship chaos charity children children's books christ christian apologetics christian fundamentalism christianity collective unconscious conscience conscious living consciousness creation depth psychology diet dreams drugs eckhart tolle edward edinger ego election evil experience faith fanaticism father first amendment foie gras freedom fundamentalism g-d garden of eden gender george w bush gnosticism goat god heaven hell historical jesus holy spirit homosexuality humor image of god imago Dei individuation inerrancy inner christianity intelligence islam jesus job joseph campbell josh mcdowell journey judging others knowl knowledge language large hadron collider lhc lilith links logic long hair love lucid living lyrics massive attack mcdonalds mel gibson miracles mircea eliade morality mysticism myth names neurosis nietzsche omniscience optical illusions paradise paradox pastor peace perfection politics prayer preconceptions protest psychology psychopomp quantum physics quotes ram dass rants reason religion religious freedom religious pluralism richard smoley righteous anger ritual rudolf bultmann science self-knowledge sin stillness suffering the creation of consciousness the only dance there is the present the self theology thought forms timothy freke tolerance total depravity trinity truth upanishads vedanta yahweh
Categories
Blogroll
Notable Sites
Recent Notable Links
Archives
- April 2009 (4)
- March 2009 (1)
- February 2009 (3)
- January 2009 (4)
- December 2008 (17)
- November 2008 (4)
- October 2008 (1)
- September 2008 (6)
- August 2008 (5)
- July 2008 (6)
- May 2008 (12)
- April 2008 (20)
- March 2008 (3)
- February 2008 (4)
- January 2008 (10)
- December 2007 (12)
- November 2007 (4)
- October 2007 (7)
- September 2007 (4)
- August 2007 (7)
- July 2007 (4)
- June 2007 (20)
- May 2007 (10)
- April 2007 (1)
- March 2007 (11)
- February 2007 (18)
- January 2007 (20)
- December 2006 (4)
- November 2006 (1)
Our Father
I’ve been motivated to look at The Lord’s Prayer in some depth. We never (or rarely) recited this prayer in the church I grew up in and, for the most part, these were just verses that I memorized at one point. There was not a lot of significance attached to them. But, as I approach Christianity anew, after several decades of separation from it, and under the influence of Jungian Depth Psychology, something is drawing me to rethink this model prayer which Jesus has given us.
I want to start with the first two words: “Our Father.”
This signifies a change in the human psyche and how we approach and relate to God. The Old Testament was the story of our infant years where God was a (seemingly) capricious, loving/hating being out there somewhere, up there in the sky somewhere. Starting with Jesus, we now relate to God as child and, sometimes, like a teenager. We have a more conscious relationship with him and he treats us less arbitrarily (at least it seems like that to us).
Consider an infant who is crying because she is hungry and her father is offering a bottle but she really wants her mother’s breast. The infant is confused and hurt that she’s not getting what she wants and her father must seem so cruel. At other times, the father puts her in her mother’s arms and she gets exactly what she wants. There is no rhyme nor reason to this. Why does her father not always give her to her mother when she cries out of hunger? Why does he sometimes (seemingly) punish her by only offering that wretched bottle? The issue is that she has no other way of relating because she does not have enough consciousness.
Now, skip ahead to a 4 or 14 year old. Now, the child can address his father as “Father” and ask for exactly what he wants. The child is capable of understanding, in some cases, why the father gives what he does. With the child’s increased consciousness, the father’s actions seem less arbitrary. And this is where Jesus was taking us. He was showing that we have an increased consciousness and, therefore, can relate to God in a different way.
What this two-word phrase also identifies is our relation to God in an essential way. That is, by calling God “Father” we are acknowledging that we are of the same essence. My daughter has my genes and is made up of the same things that I am. We have matching DNA. Our basic reality or essence is the same. In the Old Testament, or as an infant, we do not recognize this. We cannot grasp the idea that this great, powerful being who gives us what he wants to give and not what we want to receive is of the same stuff as we are. But with increased consciousness comes increased awareness of what we are and what he is. We can recognize the imago Dei, the “in our likeness” that is within us from God. “Our Father” is not only said out of respect or out of love. It is also said out of identification — we are of the same essence as God. We share the same DNA.
A local church has a quote from Hafiz on their sign: “Little by little you will turn into God.” We do turn into our fathers. How many times have I done something or said something or caught a glimpse of myself and thought, “My God! My father does that! I’m turning into my father.” And this is the case with God, our Father. But it’s also the reality that we already are our father. Our DNA tells us that from the moment of conception. What appears to be a “turning into” is really nothing more than a “realizing that we already are.”